Pregame: Green Archers vs Blue Eagles Round 2

Can the Green Archers clip the Blue Eagle’s wings for a second straight time this season? Possibly, but it will be harder this time. During their first round encounter, the heavily-favored Ateneo team was left flabbergasted when they saw their seemingly large 9-point margin disappear in a matter of 3 minutes. Yes, it appeared to be a won game already for them but La Salle snatched it away at the last minute.
All livid and aching for some payback, expect the defending champions to stamp their class over our young team right from the onset of the game. La Salle has to be physically and mentally prepared as they will be in for a tough 40-minute grind this coming Sunday.

What should the Green Archers not do?
Be Overexcited - Playing in front of thousands of rabid fans as well as being seen by millions in television, it seems like the whole world is watching your every move. In a game where the stakes are high, there is a tendency for players to show some hesitation with the fear of being scrutinized for every possible mistake. I say just have fun, play loose out there and enjoy.

Losing their cool – Expect Ateneo to be a physical, especially on defense. They will maximize whatever advantage they have in terms of bulk and experience to the hilt in this showdown. Though the Archers have already shown a lot of poise and composure especially against the other rugged teams in the UAAP, this game brings a different atmosphere all together.

What the numbers say so far
After 9 games, it might be interesting to look at the comparative stats to see how this game might go. The UAAP has compiled the numbers of all the teams, so let’s look how the teams have performed in the different areas of the game.

The key individuals
Ateneo Coach Black has a regular 9-man rotation to which he gives an average of at least 10 minutes of playing time per game: Long (26), Salamat (25), Salva (23), Buenafe (21), Chua (19), Golla (18), Monfort (16), Escueta (14), dela Cruz (14). Coach Dindo allocates at least 10 minutes to 11 players, and most likely Gab would also have averaged that if he had been fit. Only Nico, Oda, Martin, and Aiki have been seeing an average of less than a quarter of action per game.

Scoring
Ateneo ranked 2nd in points scored with an average of 72.6 ppg against the Archers’ 70.6, while on defensive end, Ateneo is #1, allowing opponents to score 62.1 ppg against our 62.8 ppg. Clearly both teams are very defensively oriented. As far as the points are concerned, the teams are roughly equal.

In terms of overall field goal shooting accuracy, Ateneo is hitting 41% of their fgs while taking less shots (235/572 attempts) than the Green Archers, who hit 38% (242/637). The Blue Eagles shot better from close range (195/427 for 46%) compared to La Salle (195/471 or 41%). From the long court, however, our team was slightly more accurate, 47/166 for 28.3% vs Ateneo’s 40/145 fro 27.6%. We scored more from the perimeter, 25.8 ppg against the Blue Eagles’ 22.8 ppg.

Ateneo was more active in getting fouls for free throws, and they shot better (#1 in free throw accuracy) from the line (143/199 – 72 %) against our 104/177 (59%); we are ranked 7th in that area. We gave up 73 points by way of missed foul shots – if you think about it, that’s a bit more than our average score for a game. Look at it another way – and if we had only been as accurate as Ateneo’s 72%, we would have scored an additional 23 points in our 9 games so far, probably would have won one or more of the 3 games we lost (by a total of 10 points). Games are truly won or lost at the foul line.

On the other hand, we scored more points in the paint, averaging 36.2 per game against Ateneo’s 30.9, showing that our frontline, although undersized, is competitive.

In the first round, we held Ateneo to 33% shooting from the field, way below their average, while we shot at the same clip, and we outperformed them from the foul line, 23/33=70% against their 16/26=62%.

None of our players averages in double figures; our top scorers are Simon, Sam, Maui, Yutien, and Joshua. Ateneo has 3 players averaging more than 10 points: Chua, Salamat, and Salva.

3Point FG accuracy – our most accurate shooters are Gab, Sam, Simon, Joel, and Almond, who collectively average over 30%. Only 5 Blue Eagles have hit from the trifecta area (Long-11/32, Monfort-15/35, Salamat-8/31, Tiongslo-5/10, and Salva (1/3) – they average 35%. It will be interesting to allow Austria (0/5), Buenafe (0/17!!!), and Gonzaga (0/3) to shoot continue to from afar.

2Point FG accuracy – If we can get the ball to Yutien, Nico, Jovet, Papot, Maui, and Almond, chances are that they will convert their shots, since the poorest shooter in this group is Almond who hits 34% of his shots. Ateneo’s most accurate shooters are Chua (35/59), dela Cruz (21/37), Golla (14/27), Buenafe (21/43), Salva (38/82), and Tiongson (6/13). All of these Blue Eagles are inside operators, so if they can be kept away from the paint, their shooting will probably suffer.

Free throw shooting – note to the Green Archers: don’t foul the Blue Eagles. Austria, Buenafe, Chua, Monfort, Salamat, and Salva all hit 70% or more of their shots. On our side, I’d like Yutien, Gab, and Almond to take our foul shots – they hit at least 70% also.

Defense
Both teams put a premium on defense, and are ranked #1 and 2 in holding down the opponents’ field goal accuracy. Ateneo is #1 at defending the 2pointer, keeping opponents to 36.1% shooting while we are #2 at 40.5%. Defending farther out is La Salle’s specialty – opponents hit only 22% of their 3point attempts and are able to score only an average of 19 perimeter points against us. In comparison, Ateneo’s opponents manage to hit 29% of their rainbow shots and are able to score 27 perimeter points against the Blue Eagles.

Rebounding
For an undersized team, the Archers surprisingly led the league in rebounds with an average of 47 per game. Ateneo is #3 with 43 per game. We had 167 offensive rebounds against their 117, but they were better at the defensive end with 271 versus our 257. In our first game against them, the rebounding was even, 45-44.

Ateneo is slightly better at keeping opponents away from the boards, giving up 41.8 rebounds to the opponent (#5) while we are #6 with the 44.7 rebounds we allow the opponents to pull down.

Ateneo has no dominant rebounder. Despite their height advantage, they share the load among Chua, Golla, Salva, Buenafe, and Long, who all average at least 4 rebounds per game. It will be a good idea to box these guys out all the time. Their best offensive rebounder is Chua. Maui, Yutien, Jovet are our usual reliables on the boards, assisted by Almond and Simon.

Assists
Ateneo is #1 in assists with 18.3 per game, while we’re #2 at 16.1. Both teams are equally effective at disrupting the offense of the opponents,; Ateneo allows the opponents to compile an average of 12.3 assists (#2) against our 12.8 per game (#3). In our first encounter, the assist numbers were more or less equal, 17-16.

Buenafe, Long, and Salamat are the chief playmakers of Ateneo, averaging around 4 assists among themselves. It is their game that our guards must disrupt, cut off the passing lanes and keep the pressure on them all the time. Our guards drive our unselfish offense, led by Simon, Joel, Luigi, Sam, and Nico.

Steals
Ateneo tops the league in steals with 7.1 per game, while we’re not far behind at 6.3 (#3). On the other end, however, we allow the opponents to steal the ball 5.6 times a game (5) while Ateneo is a run higher at 4.7 (#4). In our game against them, Ateneo stole the ball 9 times while we repaid the favor 7 times.

Salamat has a deserved reputation as a ball thief, getting the ball away from his man around 3 times a game. Chua has active hands also, and manages to steal the ball twice in a game. On our side, Luigi, Joel and Maui also average 2 turnovers a game, so they should be a bit more careful with the ball.

Blocked shots
Ateneo is tied for #2 with around 4.4 blocks per game, while we’re just a step behind at 4.1 per game. On the other end, our players get blocked an average of 5 times a game (#7) while Ateneo is just slightly better at 4.2 (#6). Our first game saw our players block 4 shots, while Ateneo blocked 3 of our shots.

Turnovers
The Green Archers’ pressure defense is tops in forcing opponents to turn over the ball 22 times a game. Ateneo is #3 at 18.8 per game. On the offensive end, however, we give the ball away an average of 18.3 times a game (#5) while Ateneo is slightly better at 15.1 per game (#4).
Buenafe, Salamat, Long and Salva cough up the ball around twice per game among themselves, so it will be a good idea to keep the pressure on them.

The bottom line
And what should the Green Archers do? Simply play with a lot heart. They have already overachieved by surpassing their 2009 record anything beyond that will just make this season even more special.
So again, have fun, play loose, enjoy and just be cool. We’re still the underdogs here so the pressure is still on them to avoid another embarrassing setback.



Get updates from this blog straight to your inbox. Enter your email address below

Delivered by FeedBurner

  • painkillaz

    Never mind the stats! Just give them 40 minutes of hell! GO GREEN ARCHERS! DO IT ONE MORE TIME!

  • migs

    i agree with painkillaz. Throw the stat sheet away if its la salle-ateneo. basta laban hanggang dulo. Walang susuko. Sirain nyo ang fighting spirit ng kalaban. Pakita nyo kung bakit kelangan nila tayo katakutan..ANIMO LA SALLE!!!

  • pipit

    overheard from the other side that they are so much excited with “BAWI” and they can even sweep the 2nd round… prove them wrong ARCHERS!!!

    ANIMO LASALLE!!!

  • Jason

    Makakapaglaro na ba si Marata? We need that kid.

    Please Archers, One more time! ANIMO LA SALLE!

  • ICJ

    we must prove that the win last round was no fluke. i’m sure the blue side will be itching to get back to us. 6-0 for them in two years. let’s make it 2-0 for us this year. prove that it was no fluke, but ALL HEART.
    Animo La Salle!!!

  • Proud Archer

    We match up very well against Ateneo. Our faster game pace lures their “Beat the Archers” egos into a running game. This is NOT Ateneo’s game. Buenafe, for one, has a stamina problem for 40 minutes of running and gunning. Our guards, as a rotational unit, are much better than theirs, although Salamat is better than any one single guard of ours.

    Ateneo has a point guard rotational problem, while we have different looks in our backcourt. Our frontline now holds more than its own against ANY team, including theirs. We have shot blocking presence now in Papot and Yutien, which allows our press to be all the more aggressive.

    But hold your horses. Don’t get carried away. These are the DEFENDING CHAMPIONS we are talking about here. Our game is there so we MUST play it 40 straight minutes. And Nel is correct. This is a no pressure game for us. Don’t think about being joint second with them and Adamson. Just have fun playing our game and everything will turn out OK for us.

    Battlecry tomorrow…..DEFENSE, DEFENSE DEFENSE. 40 minutes of defensive pressing HELL!!!!! ANIMO!!!!!!!!!!

  • Gerald Christian

    You can do it Archers we really need this game! I know you guys can do it. Keep the Faith, and bring back the glory to TAFT once again. Animo DLSU! La Salle Basketball is the best in UAAP! Im so boost up seeing DLSU Greenarchers now.. I love them all and in my eyes their HEROES talaga. DLSU ANIMO LA SALLE!

  • Jeff

    KEEP THEE FAITH!
    DERECHO LA SALLE!

  • http://deleted kiko

    Our big boys should hold their grounds and hope that Webb will come out of his shell…..Go DLSU!!!!Beat the blues!!!

  • Fred_Cebu

    La Salle has the deeper bench hence it can sustain a 40 minute full court press against the eagles. Our bench players are also much better in terms of quality. I am pretty sure our rookies will shine again this afternoon.

  • http://anthonydio.blogspot.com/ Anthony Dio

    my keys to the game:

    - RUN!!

    - DEFENSE!! all game long!! execute the dreaded La Salle full court press. our bigs (Paredes, Andrada, Villanueva, Ferdinand) should always challenge Ateneo’s inside plays.

    - force the Ateneo guards to foul trouble. it worked in the first meeting, when Salamat got 2 quick fouls in the 1st qtr. it seems that Ateneo’s overdependent on their point guards.

    - balanced scoring.

    - be careful with the freethrows.

    >>>— ANIMO LA SALLE!! —>

  • MR Abello

    V for vendetta.

    Tit for tat.

    Yep, shameful performance on our part.

    Good game by the other side thanks to Long who sparked that steep chasm of a deficit.

    They really wanted to get back at us hard and sorry to say, we just let them.

    Real letdown.

    Let’s move on and forward.

    Animo!

  • bill

    I agree with kiko, what an embarrassing performance.

    View From The Desk Chair:

    The Eagles did not only win, but they win BIG. The archers lost, they lost the game, they steal the ball and then lost the ball, they lost spirit after 5 mins of the first quarter.

    What went right: Mendoza

    What went wrong: Everything else beside mendoza

    Rookie watch: not much after this game

    ***At one time during the game, Kirk Long outscored the entire starting line-up of DLSU, what a shame
    For the other user who will comment, do not dare to mention that marata’s off-night because of Dengue recovery had a significant effect to why we lost. He’s one player, take this lost as a man, no excuses, we just sucked at this specific day.

  • Kikom@n

    ateneo played the perfect game. good defense accompanied by superb offense (their passing game is very good). on our part, our boys played ‘gigil’ basketball; opting to make a play on their own and not passing to the open man. to add insult to injury, our freethrow shooting was horrendous compared to ateneo’s. in short, we got schooled by the blue team!

    the only bright spot was jovet mendoza’s play in the second half.

    i just hope the team learns a lot from this game, keep their heads up and move forward to the next game, remembering that our goal this year is to reach the Final 4.

    KEEP THE FAITH!

    AN1MO LA SALLE!

  • dxxs

    Correction, Tiongson is not an inside operator. :) )

  • http://yahoo.com sonny

    WORST LOSS OF THE SEASON SO FAR…… AND AGAINST ATENEO AT THAT. SIGH. SAD WAY TO START THE WEEK

  • mimi

    learn and move on! :) keep the faith!

  • critique

    because of this game, UE, NU, UST can still catch-up with us, and looking at our schedule, that is very very possible.

  • cosmo

    I have to agree with bill! Except with regards to Marata. The kid came from “dengue” and in any other case he is still recovering. I’m assuming that he didn’t get to practice before this game as I saw him trying his best during the round robin…as well as during the game, despite the defense given to him.

    I guess the super extended half-time at the dug-out wasn’t enough for the team!

    In my opinion, Jovet Mendoza is the only consistent player in this team! He may not have scored as much as the others…but when he is on the court you’ll see him doing his job in every single game! KUDOS to you kid!

    That’s how the cookie crumbles!

    The team needs to re-group and build their confidence back! Bring back the full court press!

    ANIMO LA SALLE

  • bill

    I respect your opinion sir, but I believe this is a team sport, why do you think Lebron still has no ring?Or kobe never won a ring before Gasol? Even though Marata can be considered as our best player, he is still one player. If Marata was at 100% are you sure that we could have won with the way the whole team played?(with the exception of Mendoza). I think we would still lose, and Marata could have made the game closer, but if the team played like that, it would not matter if marata hit 7 threes, it wouldn’t matter cause the team simply sucked at playing TODAY.

    We cannot just move forward, we have to reflect not just why Ateneo won, but how they defeat us. I’m no coach but the 2-3 zone is eating the offense alive, Ateneo just defended how Adamson did it on the second half. Zone defense, how do we solve this without relying just outside shots? Teams will just play 2-3 zone on us and chances are, they would win, unless we do something about it.

    You guys are right, move forward, but how will you move forward, cause we can’t bulldoze our way forward. We cannot ignore the zone anymore. The season is not over, but it will be when we “just move forward”.

    (no disrespect to anyone)

  • pipit

    i agree with bill the 2-3 zone is killing us. I hope the coaching staff can resolved this in our next game.. It is an uphill battle for our team. Aside from solving the 2-3 zone defense, we need to upgrade our full court press as they easily avoid it.

    kayang kaya pa yan… ANIMO LASALLE!!!

  • cosmo

    @bill agree with you sir! It’s simply saying that there’s no I in T-E-A-M!

    I think you’ll notice since our game vs Adamson our games have been off. Our team was struggling during the 1st half vs NU and UP. In those games we were lucky that the rookies (alternate of sophs and vets) stepped up during the 2nd half.

    The difference between the NU/UP game and yesterday’s game is that Ateneo is a more solid and aggressive team..and they’re our archrivals! They’ll make sure that their revenge is sweeter! Sadly..Indeed it was.

    I’m still hopeful and a believer. But it will all depend on our team (players to the coaching staff) if they want to achieve the impossible.

    ANIMO La Salle! =)