Jun Limpot – Why not retire his Jersey as well?

limpot_040409With the recent jersey retirement of Manilla Santos, there have been plenty of discussions going on with regards to other athletes who deserve such an honor as well. While there were plenty of outstanding players who donned the green and white uniform through the years, it just does not make sense to retire everyone who played superbly during their 4 to 5 years of eligibility. For something as monumental as a retirement ceremony, there is a need to select the best among the best.

For a player to be at least considered for retirement, he or she should have made a significant impact not only to their team’s success but also in the league.

One such player who we feel truly deserves to have his number raised to the gym rafters is none other than Zandro “Jun” Limpot. He played for the Archers from 1988 to 1992 and led the team to 2 (should be 3) titles while reaping numerous individual honors along the way.

Limpot was used sparingly during his rookie year back in 1988. The skinny kid from Surigao often rode the bench, as he had to be contented playing backup to the more senior slotmen in the team. He was hardly a factor in the De La Salle – Ateneo championship series in which the Blue Eagles prevailed over the Dindo Pumaren-led Green Archers for back-to-back championships.

Despite being a non-factor in the series, Limpot was definitely given a baptism of fire for he became the player nobody thought he would be the following season.

Limpot truly blossomed into a fine center after moving to the starting position in his sophomore year. Such turned out to be a brilliant plan in coach Derrick Pumaren’s part as the vastly-improved Limpot almost single-handedly brought the Green Archers to the finals and eventually to their first-ever UAAP senior’s basketball title. He atoned for his failure to win Rookie of the year by plucking the Most Valuable Player citation.

He racked up his second MVP the following year and gave De La Salle another championship, as the Green Archers defeated the University of the East Red Warriors in the finals.

Limpot once again carried the Green Archers on his shoulders in 1991 and back to the championship series for the fourth consecutive year. La Salle should have won the three-peat crown if not for a wanton protest by Far Eastern University on Tony Boy Espinosa’s entry in the dying seconds of the game despite having fouled out. Still, Limpot placed second in the MVP race behind Johnny Abbarientos, the only guard to have plucked the award in the 90s.

La Salle was left out of the championship picture in 1992, settling for third place as Limpot and the Green Archers watched FEU pommel Adamson University for the Tamaraws’ lame version of a back-to-back.

Nevertheless, Limpot managed to capture his third MVP award in his final year, a footnote to an illustrious collegiate career.

So why not retire Jersey Number 9 as well? What do you think?

With excerpts from greenarcher.net article on Jun Limpot – July 1, 2000



Get updates from this blog straight to your inbox. Enter your email address below

Delivered by FeedBurner

  • umore

    Huwag na.

    Otherwise, we would have a backlog of people asking to retire the jersies of players past.

    Sige kayo, baka ang mga number ng mga player ng La Salle baka maging 100, 101, 234,, 989! HAHA!

    Magaling naman si Limpot, tsaka mayaman na siya from the PBA. Hindi nangyari i-retire ang numero niya before, bakit hahabulin pa ngayon?

    Ang mas magandang itanong, bakit puro basketball ang feature dito sa GA.ph eh ang daming sports na nilalahukan ang La Salle. :-)

    Isa pang tanong, bakit hindi niyo dagadagan ang content ng website to include provincial schools as well?

  • TJ

    I think its never too late to honor someone. In the NBA for example sometimes they retire jersey numbers of players who have already been inactive for a long time. I’m not sure if there will be campaign for this but I do agree with the author that Limpot deserves the same honor as Bachmann, Lim Eng Beng and Ritualo.

    Umore,

    If this is your first time to visit this site, there are plenty of articles aside from basketball here. Look at the archives and see for yourself.

    I leave it up to the admins here to officially answer your 2nd question but IMHO this is a site centered on DLSU manila sports. There’s limited information perhaps on the other sports activities of the other La Salle schools in the provinces.

  • http://pengengstresstabs.multiply.com myheartisgreen

    i think umore has a point… =)

    and those are just numbers… i, personally remember and value one good athlete by his/her name… not by his/her jersey number…

    or maybe i should just be honest about the fact that i’m not good at remembering jersey numbers of athletes… haha =D

    *peace everyone*

    ANIMO!

  • justin

    personally i think that jersey retirement has something to do with how many championships you win for your school, and also having a MAJOR part in each of those championships. preferably at least 4 out of the 5 playing years, like renren ritualo and manilla santos.

  • green archer fan

    How about Em Penetrante? She was also a major part in some of the Lady Spikers’ championships. may MVP’s din siya to boot.

  • Rektikano

    Aside from his exploits with the Green Archers, Jun Limpot also served the national team several times. This should also be considered why his number 9 should be retired. In serving the national team, Jun has gone from the RP youth to the men’s team. In La Salle, he won 3 UAAP championships (1989, 1990, 1991*), was MVP for 3 of his 5 years (1989, 1990 and 1992) and was part of the first team mythical five 4 of his 5 years(1989, 1990, 1991 and 1992).

    And off the playing court, Jun Limpot also has a bachelor’s degree from La Salle which I think should be a major criteria in retiring a player’s jersey number.

    2009 is the 20th anniversary of our first UAAP basketball championship and what a way to commemorate the event by retiring the number 9 of the guy who rose from a bench warmer in his freshman year (1988) to MVP in his sophomore year while delivering home our first UAAP men’s basketball championship.

  • swingman

    I think we should only retire the name-number-sport combination. Like there can never be another Ritualo # 4 playing in Men’s basketball, nor another Santos # 12 in DLSU women’s volleyball.

    Pero kung halimbawa iba naman ang name mo at maglalaro ka ng women’s volleyball, then you can use # 14. Or kung # 4 ka na Ritualo pero soccer naman ang laro mo, okay lang din.

    In amateur sports, jersey numbers are limited. In FIBA, 4-15 lang. Sa UAAP ata, 4-24. Traditionally sa volleyball, 1-15, pero sa UAAP ata hanggang 18 or 20 okay lang. Still, limited pa rin. Dadating yung araw when we’ll have more players on a team than the remaining, allowable jersey numbers.

    Just a thought.

  • JL

    I agree with swingman, a retired number should only be limited to that particular sport.

    Limpot’s achievements as cited by rektikano makes me wonder really why he was snubbed for this honor. I say it could be probably due to the following:

    1. He was hardly used during his Rookie year thus not making a huge impact in all his playing years.
    2. He did not win a championship in his final year therefore it wasn’t a grand or memorable exit if you think about it.
    3. Nobody probably thought of having jerseys retired during his time. If they considered Limpot in recent years, what might probably linger in their recent memory is how he became an underachiever in his many years playing in the PBA. They retired Ritualo’s jersey when he was just about to start his pro career.
    4. Then of course there’s always the hype. The advent of advanced technology and media gives so much exposure to this generation of athletes making them celebrity icons at this stage of their career. IMHO if Limpot was still an Archer now, he will definitely get his number 9 jersey up in the roof.

    Yes I agree that’s it’s never too late to honor The Main Man!

  • http://bradpetehoops.blogspot.com/ Bradpete

    Yes! The Main Man or The Big Deal deserves it.

  • umore

    Hi Guys.

    TJ, yup, meron nga naman ditong mga non-basketball articles. Marami-rami na rin, I guess. Siguro, its just too much basketball pa rin. Nakaka-umay na.

    If you haven’t noticed, di pa yata tayo nananalo ng general championship. We wont win one by just riding on our basketball pedigree alone. Sana lang magkaroon ng matinong godfather ang ibang sports para talagang i-push ang karamihan sa mga la salle teams na maging kampeon sa UAAP.

    Sana rin, maging kilala ang la salle sa regional competitions at sa international level. astig yun.

    Sige na nga, kung gusto niyo iretiro ang numero ni Jun Limpot, lets do it! Magaling naman siya. :-)

    Go Jun Limpot!!! Pa-autograph.

  • Rektikano

    When we retire a green archer’s jersey number, his exploits in the professional leagues should be irrelevant. After all, what we are honoring were his accomplishments while a student-athlete of De La Salle University. And yes, serving for flag and country while a student-athlete is a major accomplishment.

    Maybe placing just third place in 1992 is one of the factors why some people frown in retiring Jun’s jersey #9. But basketball is a team game. You cannot just rely on one man alone. Besides, he was honored as league MVP that year so that alone speaks for his dominance that year.

    Nothing is too late. We can still retire his number now. But it would be more meaningful if nobody will use #9 anymore for the meantime.

    By the way, after Jun Limpot, some players who used number 9 were Maui Roca, Carlo Sharma, Cholo Villanueva, Alvin Castro and currently Josh Webb.

  • TJ

    Hi Rektikano

    I agree with you completely. The problem is that some Filipinos have short term memories and they sometimes only remember what a person is at the present. Yes Limpot was a great amateur player but the frustrations he experienced in the PBA will somehow in a way stick more to the minds of many. I wish we honored the moment he graduated.

    Makes me think that this entire retirement thing is a becoming a popularity contest. If you read other sites, they’re even clamoring for the retirement of JV casio. No offense to JV but I dont think he deserves it. This is an example of being popular and too recent.

    And with Ritualo, I still have my reservations. Look, his first 3 years it was really Telan and Allado who was the main man with both winning MVP during that period. In 2000 and 2001, since we no longer have a post presence, he struggled offensively as the defense is now focused on him. Buti na lang we had a super guard named Mike Cortez. He didnt even win an MVP in all his 5 years. If we’re talking about intangibles are there any?

    We should at the very least retire all those who won an MVP award. That alone justifies greatness.

  • http://archerpride.com RobinHood

    Jun Limpot was the one responsible for giving us a championship since the 1974 NCAA. He led us to our first three UAAP championships. Threepeat baby!!! Not even the Lakers achieved this in our era. He brought back De La Salle Basketball in the map. To be consistent with the retirement of nos. 14, 4 & 33, #9 should be retired!!!!!

  • TheMainMan

    Yup, Jun Limpot HAS TO BE RECOGNIZED.

    He is a great Archer. He became one of the finest PBA players ever. Definitely makes sense to retire his Archer jersey.